Showing posts with label Maud Mandel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maud Mandel. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 23, 2023

Famous Haystack Monument Vandalized: More Anti-Christian Hate at Williams College

WILLIAMSTOWN, MA - The famous Haystack Monument, a pilgrimage point for students of Christian evangelism, has been crudely vandalized twice within the last two weeks by proponents of anti-Christian hate on the grounds of Williams College. According to a recent report in the Williams Record

Perpetrators drew graffiti on the Haystack Monument Friday night, marking the second time in two weeks that the monument has been defaced. 

President Maud S. Mandel sent a campus-wide email yesterday (May 21, 2023) notifying the College community of the incident. The monument, which commemorates five Williams students’ 1806 formation of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, was spray-painted with allusions to Christianity in red graffiti that resembled the May 13 defacement. The perpetrators have not been identified. 

“This time the slogans were ‘Hell is hot,’ ‘Shame on you,’ and ‘Ouch’ as well as an obscenity,” Mandel wrote. A Campus Safety Services (CSS) officer discovered the graffiti while canvassing the area during a standard check, Director of CSS Eric Sullivan wrote in an email to the Record. According to Mandel, CSS has increased its patrol of the area and is working with the Williamstown Police Department to follow leads. 

“Given that the Monument memorializes the Christian missionary movement, some people of faith may be experiencing these incidents as attacks on your religion and on you personally,” she wrote. “You belong here, and I will work for your and everyone’s right to a safe community.”

Maud's email emphasized her intent to get to the bottom of the matter saying that the people responsible would be held to account. She encouraged anyone who might have relevant information to contact Campus Safety Services (CSS) at (413) 597-4444. Tellingly, she added that callers may remain anonymous if they wish. 

She also highlighted resources that were available to support the Christian students who are, at least, the indirect targets of this hateful attack. In particular, she encouraged them to contact the Chaplains’ Office or the Davis Center for support. It will be interesting to see how each office proposes to protect evangelical Christians from the abuse generated by the anti-colonial, anti-evangelical ideologies these offices have maintained for decades. 

Thankfully, Jennifer Kabbany at The College Fix has called national attention to this most recent example of anti-Christian hate on the campus.

An article in a blog site called The Everyday Chirp indicated that "A petition has been circulating encouraging the college to respond to the vandalism with a public statement emphasizing that religious intolerance is not welcome on campus."

Maud recommended students hurting from an attack on one of the most prominent symbols of Christianity on campus seek support from the teams in the Dean of the College’s office and Integrative Wellbeing Services. A quick review of each website showed there was ample information provided about COVID-19, but no mention of the hateful attack on the Haystack Monument. Unfortunately, the plight of Christians at Williams College is illustrated by the comments of student activists including a transgender advocate who approved disparaging Christians here and another who sought to impress upon us her Trans Anger on the heels of the murderous behavior of a trans activist who killed six Christians in Nashville, TN on March 27, 2023.

This week's attack on the Haystack Monument was a reminder of a similar attack that occurred earlier. Again, as the Williams Record reported on May 15, 2023: 

Campus Safety Services (CSS) officers responded to reports that unknown perpetrators defaced the Haystack Monument with spray-painted graffiti, President Maud S. Mandel wrote in a campus-wide email on Monday that alerted the College community to the defacement. CSS received reports from a student through its dispatch center and anonymous tip line on Saturday, shortly after midnight, Director of CSS Eric Sullivan wrote in an email to the Record.

“The graffiti included an obscenity along with the words and phrases ‘Pagan Rule,’ ‘Blood,’ ‘Ouch,’ and ‘Hail Satan,’” Mandel wrote. Custodial staff responded at 6:00 a.m. on Saturday by power-washing the graffiti, though they were unable to remove the bulk of the damage, Sullivan wrote to the Record. According to Mandel, Facilities is arranging for the remainder of the writing to be cleaned.

According to a call log obtained by the Record, CSS alerted the Williamstown Police Department to the graffiti in a phone call Tuesday, and the defacement was filed as a “bias-motivated incident.” The motivation and perpetrators are not yet known, Sullivan wrote to the Record.

The Haystack Monument commemorates the location of the 1806 gathering of five Williams students that led to the formation of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM), during which the students sheltered under a haystack during a thunderstorm. Mission Park is also named for their meeting. ABCFM was a major Christian missionary organization throughout the 19th century and the largest in the United States, sending missionaries to China, India, Hawai’i, and several North American Indigenous nations. “The Haystack Monument has been a focal point for ongoing campus discussions about Williams’ institutional history,” Mandel wrote. “We expect those discussions to continue in the next academic year.”

The incident marks the second time in recent years that the Haystack Monument has been defaced: in 2018, mud was smeared onto the sides of the monument, and three concentric half-circles were carved into the ground between the monument and the benches that surround it. The perpetrators were never identified.

Personally, I remember standing beside the Haystack Monument and being surprised by its emotional power. It is amazing to think of all the good that was done by the young men who, on that spot, made a resolution to bring the benefits of Christianity to individuals living far beyond the boundaries of their own country. The monument is a reminder of the great things that can happen when a small group of people commit themselves to a great project. 

Additional articles regarding the Haystack Monument were released by the Berkshire Eagle, Blaze MediaChristian Broadcast NetworkDaily Mail, Everyday Chirp, Fox NewsJewish World Review, Legal Insurrection, and New Boston Post.

John C. Drew, Ph.D. is an award-winning political scientist and a former Williams College professor. He is an occasional contributor at American Thinker, Breitbart, Front Page, PJMedia and WND.

Saturday, June 26, 2021

Paying More, Enjoying It Less: Student Approval Reaches a Depressing Low

WILLIAMSTOWN, MA - According to a 
new poll released by the Williams Record, student opinion about the college's institutions and policies is heading in a negative direction. 

"Compared to the approval ratings survey from the fall 2020 semester," they wrote, "approval of the College dropped 17 percent, from 86 percent to 69 percent, while approval for President Maud S. Mandel decreased by 16 percent, from 72 percent to 56 percent. Eighty-five percent of students approved of the College faculty, a three percent decrease from the previous semester."

The study itself looks credible. There are about 2,000 students at the college. They report that they sent the approval rating survey to 500 randomly selected students. They indicated they got 169 respondents to answer their questions. They are reporting a response rate of 34 percent. Demographically, they report that, of the respondents, 36 percent were first-years, 18 percent were sophomores, 26 percent were juniors, and 20 percent were seniors.

One of the things that made the students unhappy was the heavy-handed approach president Maud Mandel took in cracking down on illegal campus drinking. The campus security staff shut down a large party at the famous Wood House and apparently there is still a lot of anger associated with the issue and with the fairly harsh punishments Maud dealt out to the youthful party-goers. 

Since there is basically no risk at all for young people exposed to COVID-19, I can imagine why they thought the college's policies were stupid and okay to ignore for a night. Nevertheless, the conflict over Wood House opened the door for campus do-gooders to smear the characters of the unfortunate students who had simply suffered enough of this bullshit and decided to take their chances that night. 

Writing about the Wood House debacle, the Williams Record shared the comments of Gigi Gamez ’22 who was worried about having on campus the type of person who would attend a party like that because they would probably be reckless in other ways too. The behavior of the partying students was "disheartening" to her. Disheartening, by the way, is a fancy way of saying that something is causing you to lose determination or confidence. 

I suppose we can take satisfaction ourselves in the fact that students are not happy with the results of their own woke students, faculty, and administrators who have turned the school into a leftist, critical theory-inspired madrasa. In a sane world, students would be less worried about shaming those who do not fear COVID-19 and more worried about the dangers of those cold, slippery, icy little roads.

John C. Drew, Ph.D. is an award-winning political scientist and a former Williams College professor. He is an occasional contributor at American Thinker, Breitbart, Front Page, PJMedia and WND.

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Anxious Faculty Leaders Spin Williams College Free Speech Statement to Differentiate It from the Beloved Chicago Principles

WILLIAMSTOWN, MA - I looked through the new Williams Record article on the school's new freedom of speech statement. Personally, I thought it looked a lot like the Chicago Principles. I'm happy with the new documents except for a few minor issues. Elsewhere, I have argued that the statement represents a refutation of the prior Sawicki Report which advocated the terrible idea of establishing a mechanism to preserve "dignitary safety." This could have been used to protect students from speech that hurt their feelings.


On campus, however, it looks like the authors of the statement are scrambling to make it look like it is significantly different from the Chicago Principles. In my view, this looks like a lame attempt to appease campus radicals including the Williams College professor who threatened to bring violence to the school if it enacted the Chicago Principles.

Humorously, Sawicki appears to grasp at straws to maintain the fiction that the final result reflected the views of her disappointing and nearly impossible to read report. In her view, the new statement differs from the Chicago Principles in that it requires question and answer sessions and vaguely complains about the challenges faced by those with less power on campus. By leaving out specific words about who has less power on campus, the resulting statement leaves open the obvious possibility that the real victims on campus have been conservative students and faculty who have been routinely repressed and oppressed for their views.

Even worse, Sawicki fails to appreciate the degree to which the statement backed off her earlier trial balloon that each student organization should have a faculty adviser to run their ideas on speaker invitations by prior to inviting someone or her equally restrictive suggestion that students be forced to examine how their choice of speakers might impact others.

Desperate to save face, Sawicki observes the statement makes an “implicit” commitment to empower speech of marginalized groups through reform curricular and pedagogical reform. How silly.

Laughably, Wilcox asserts her committee “...really wanted to be a kind of neutral conduit for what had come out in the report." Anxious to avoid on campus blow back, Wilcox lamely suggests that she views the statement as a “living document” that could be revisited in the future if necessary. Oh, please...

“The statement that we came out with differs from the Chicago statement in that everyone has wanted to express that we have a concern for one another that is not some kind of mechanistic idea of the marketplace of ideas,” Wilcox said. “I could say ‘respect,’ but I think it’s a little bit stronger than that … I think we are interested in enabling one another to speak freely, and that’s a kind of concern that strikes me as being a little bit more generous or more interested in one another as human beings than might be the case in a more Chicago-style statement.”

All in all, today is a great day for freedom of speech at Williams College. The Sawicki report has been rejected, the Chicago Principles have dominated the final results, and the statement's vagueness provides help to conservatives who have been the ones most sorely mistreated and harmed by the schools recent practices including toleration for mob rule and cancel culture. The full text of the article is below the break.


Friday, September 6, 2019

Breaking News! President Maud's Start of the Semester Message - Many Phonecasts Ahead


Dear Williams Alumni, Families and Friends,

Today, President Mandel sent the following start of semester message to the campus community and she asked that I forward it to you.

Strategic Planning continues to be front of mind and this semester the working groups will be seeking input from all corners of the Williams community. Please save the dates below for Community Phonecasts about Strategic Planning, all moderated by President Mandel. Information about format, registration and participation is forthcoming.

Thursday, October 17, 1-2pm ET
Senior Staff members Provost Dukes Love and VP for Institutional Diversity and Equity, Leticia S. E. Haynes '99
Working Group discussions include:
Governance
Sustainability
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Thursday, November 21, 2-3pm ET
Senior Staff members Dean of the College, Marlene Sandstrom, VP for Campus Life, Steve Klass and Dean of the Faculty, Denise Buell
Working Group discussions include:
Student Learning
Learning Beyond the Classroom
Faculty and Staff Development

Thursday, December 5, 1-2pm ET
Senior Staff member VP for Finance and Administration and Treasurer, Fred Puddester and Assistant to the President for Community and Government
Affairs, Jim Kolesar ‘72
Working Group discussions include:
The Built Environment
Williams in the World

Sincerely,


Megan Morey
Vice President for College Relations

FYI: Williams Liberty is grateful to our anonymous source.