WASHINGTON, DC - Hillary Rodham’s well-disguised family weapon — Clinton Foundation — enjoys strategically investing and manipulating cutting edge technology to plant powerful resources in fertile soils of medical health-science, artificial intelligence and highly malleable neurological software.
Clinton Foundation — marred often by Hillary weak or in defeat — suffers blistering criticism from observant critics across the globe. Some call Clinton Foundation a slush fund or demonstrate its unscrupulous tactics and dealmaking. Others focus on range of suspicious activity and possibility of criminal conflict. Note also two notable challenges to integrity of the foundation:
1) The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s 2016 public corruption probe of Clinton Foundation financial expediture; access and donation intermingling.
2) Boston Globe’s editorial board urged the foundation to stop accepting donations of any kind for remainder of her beaten 2016 campaign and shut down entirely if Hillary Clinton had won a presidential election.
What is worse? Bill Clinton’s sleaze and sewage pride, but necessarily that evisceration calls for a vivid book proposal I might explore next year.
For time being, I will comment on Ms. Clinton’s behavior and openly encourage writers and journalists to thoroughly interrogate Hillary Clinton’s use and intent in using state-of-the-art technology.
Hillary is the most maligned presidential loser in American history.
Distilling my own impression: She’s a grating woman incapable of discovering sexual interest in her husband; this woman who, for some reason, married a philandering man who feels nauseous at the thought of their intercourse.
What else? Briefly, Hillary is stiff on the stump, curtly arrogant, clueless on social cues; more obviously fake in her every attempt to relate to people. Rodham frustrates because she feigns political adequacy and her deficits breed self-delusion: It’s like Hillary expects applause from all of her Black rapper friends.
I don’t know. I’ve been reading about new technology lately, talking to family, and researching personal experience. My careful review should aim at Hillary Clinton. Novel invisible technology can be designed and used to control cognitive function, trigger cerebrovascular and cardiovascular obstruction — and inflict penile and testicular pain by castration.
I want to know what Hillary Clinton thinks about these excruciating tech capabilities. I want to know if she has access to or has acquired these technologies.
Does she use them?
I want to know if Hillary Clinton embodies so many physical properties of pig manure that she might ever rationalize castrating, say, a former Clinton supporter who grew tired of her abuse and tried to expose her ruthless cruelty.
My hope is that thoughtful scholars and journalists may consider looking into Hillary Clinton’s history of exacting revenge on her political enemies, and people they care about.
Finally — I will think of a woman I care about who knows Hillary Clinton. I do consider close study of every legal means by which I and other American citizens can pressure Ms. Rodham.
Zachary R. Wood is an assistant curator at TED, as well as a former columnist and assistant opinion editor at The Guardian, a former Robert L. Bartley Fellow at The Wall Street Journal, and a class of 2018 graduate of Williams College. He is the author of Uncensored (Random House, 2019).
No comments:
Post a Comment